(no subject)
Mar. 8th, 2011 07:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Gah! Still no sign of either Elbow album. I'm beginning to feel like Bart Simpson. Except, instead of 'Where's my spy camera?', my pathetic refrain is going to be 'Where's my Cast of Thousands?'
Today, I had a rude awakening. March has come in not like a lion, but more like a sabre-toothed tiger. Or a cave bear. The weather today was absolutely FREEZING!!!! We went out early to make the most of the good (!) weather, and came scuttling in soon after, frozen to the core.
And now to Grasmere, and St Oswald's Church. When I first set foot in this place, I thought, "Ooh! That's nice!" Ten years later, my immediate response was 'Huh??? What on earth's going on here?'
This is why:-



Goodnight, all!!
Today, I had a rude awakening. March has come in not like a lion, but more like a sabre-toothed tiger. Or a cave bear. The weather today was absolutely FREEZING!!!! We went out early to make the most of the good (!) weather, and came scuttling in soon after, frozen to the core.
And now to Grasmere, and St Oswald's Church. When I first set foot in this place, I thought, "Ooh! That's nice!" Ten years later, my immediate response was 'Huh??? What on earth's going on here?'
This is why:-

In case you can't see it properly in this view down the nave, here's a better view:-

What we have is not one but two naves, subdivided by this peculiar arched wall, which has been helpfully whitewashed to conceal the mangled masonry beneath.
What we're looking at here is the early 13th century nave. The arched wall would originally have been the external N wall, only it's been well and truly butchered in the following centuries. The church's earlier form can still be seen in the roof beams - you can see a recess where the beam used to sit as part of the pitched roof.
If you look carefully, you can also see some projecting stone corbels which would have supported the cross-beams. Verdict? The configuration of the roof has changed radically in the last 800 years. Why? Well, as you can probably see, this church has not one but two naves, sitting side by side. The nave featured here forms the original high medieval core of the church, with the second nave, the Langdale Nave, added in the 1490s to accomodate the worshippers from neighbouring Langdale parish.
Who would have had to have hiked over the inhospitable tracts of fell that I featured previously just to get to church.
Poor souls...
You can just glimpse the Langdale Nave in these photographs - while it's interesting in its own right, it's the roof timbers which are particularly fascinating in this particular church building, and I'll tell you more about that in a later post. In the meantime, here's another view of this very peculiar wall:-
What we're looking at here is the early 13th century nave. The arched wall would originally have been the external N wall, only it's been well and truly butchered in the following centuries. The church's earlier form can still be seen in the roof beams - you can see a recess where the beam used to sit as part of the pitched roof.
If you look carefully, you can also see some projecting stone corbels which would have supported the cross-beams. Verdict? The configuration of the roof has changed radically in the last 800 years. Why? Well, as you can probably see, this church has not one but two naves, sitting side by side. The nave featured here forms the original high medieval core of the church, with the second nave, the Langdale Nave, added in the 1490s to accomodate the worshippers from neighbouring Langdale parish.
Who would have had to have hiked over the inhospitable tracts of fell that I featured previously just to get to church.
Poor souls...
You can just glimpse the Langdale Nave in these photographs - while it's interesting in its own right, it's the roof timbers which are particularly fascinating in this particular church building, and I'll tell you more about that in a later post. In the meantime, here's another view of this very peculiar wall:-

Goodnight, all!!
no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 09:09 pm (UTC)And they seem to arrange the playlist on the download albums differently...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-08 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-09 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-09 05:22 pm (UTC)